[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4xoHbg+6CtGhC7dPePPC44OMH8azQsOWMEJnXpCQs=bDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:00:47 +1300
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>, Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, Hailong Liu <hailong.liu@...o.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: count zeromap read and set for swapout and swapin
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 9:42 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:01:14 +1300 Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Oops, it seems that it depends on Kanchana's 'mm: change count_objcg_event() to
> > count_objcg_events() for batch event updates,' which also isn't present in 6.12.
> >
> > Otherwise, it won't build, as reported here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAGsJ_4whD31+Lk0m2uq-o=ygvkRsw1uXcPeqxBONV-RUXkeEzg@mail.gmail.com/
>
> argh.
>
Apologies for the inconvenience.
> > Hi Andrew,
> > What’s the best approach here? Should we include Kanchana's patch that extends
> > the nr argument for count_objcg_events() in 6.12-rc as well?
>
> Let's do the right thing here. I'll drop this patch from mm-hotfixes.
> Please send a v4 against Linus mainline fairly soon then I'll redo
> Kanchana's series around that.
Alright. The question is whether we should integrate Kanchana's 'mm:
change count_objcg_event() to count_objcg_events() for batch event
updates' into 'mm: count zeromap read and set for swapout and swapin,'
or keep it as a separate patch as patch 1/2?
I guess integration would be better, as hotfixes may not be ideal for a patch
series?
Thanks
Barry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists