linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 00/27] Enable CET Virtualization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00a94b5e31fba738b0ad7f35859d8e7b8dceada7.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 03:20:55 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com"
	<seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>, "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "peterz@...radead.org"
	<peterz@...radead.org>, "john.allen@....com" <john.allen@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "mlevitsk@...hat.com"
	<mlevitsk@...hat.com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/27] Enable CET Virtualization

On Wed, 2024-11-06 at 09:45 +0800, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
> > > Appreciated for your review and comments!
> > It looks like this series is very close. Since this v10, there was some
> > discussion on the FPU part that seemed settled:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1c2fd06e-2e97-4724-80ab-8695aa4334e7@intel.com/
> 
> Hi, Rick,
> I have an internal branch to hold a v11 candidate for this series, which
> resolved Sean's comments
> for this v10, waiting for someone to take over and continue the upstream work.
> 
> > 
> > Then there was also some discussion on the synthetic MSR solution, which
> > seemed
> > prescriptive enough:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20240509075423.156858-1-weijiang.yang@intel.com/
> > 
> > Weijiang, had you started a v2 on the synthetic MSR series? Where did you
> > get to
> > on incorporating the other small v10 feedback?
> 
> Yes, Sean's review feedback for v1 is also included in my above v11 candidate.

Nice, sounds like another version (which could be the last) is basically ready
to go. Please let me know if it gets stuck for lack of someone to take it over.