lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <55056f4ec0365c67576a1e1e3162b0cfeadd1c6d.1730874296.git.dsimic@manjaro.org>
Date: Wed,  6 Nov 2024 07:28:42 +0100
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
To: apw@...onical.com,
	joe@...ches.com,
	corbet@....net
Cc: dwaipayanray1@...il.com,
	lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
	workflows@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	wens@...e.org,
	dsimic@...jaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] docs: submitting-patches: Describe the use of Helped-by tag

Add the description of the intended use of Helped-by tags, which give credit
to the persons who assisted the patch authors in a way that didn't actually
contribute to the patch directly, i.e. at the source-code level.

Suggested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
---
 Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index 382c49659cb9..d0d12536ab68 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -452,8 +452,8 @@ as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with
 the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author.
 
 
-When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-developed-by:
-------------------------------------------------
+When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, Co-developed-by:, and Helped-by
+-----------------------------------------------------------
 
 The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
 development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path.
@@ -495,6 +495,14 @@ chronological history of the patch insofar as possible, regardless of whether
 the author is attributed via From: or Co-developed-by:.  Notably, the last
 Signed-off-by: must always be that of the developer submitting the patch.
 
+Helped-by: gives attribution to the persons that helped the patch authors
+in a way that didn't directly produce the patch itself.  For example, someone
+may provide significant assistance to the authors by researching the schematic
+of a device that the patch addresses, or by providing the patch authors with
+some background information required to develop the patch, while contributing
+no actual source code.  As a result of no direct patch authorship, no
+Signed-off-by: tags are needed together with Helped-by: tags.
+
 Note, the From: tag is optional when the From: author is also the person (and
 email) listed in the From: line of the email header.
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ