lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024110608-shut-strenuous-04c8@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 07:34:17 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	syzbot+d6ca2daf692c7a82f959@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: Patch "nilfs2: fix kernel bug due to missing clearing of
 checked flag" failed to apply to v6.6-stable tree

On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:21:39PM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> Hi Sasha
> 
> About 6 hours ago, I posted an adjusted patch to the list (and to
> Greg) that allows for backporting of this patch to 6.6-stable and
> earlier.
> 
> The patch is titled  "[PATCH 4.19 5.4 5.10 5.15 6.1 6.6] nilfs2: fix
> kernel bug due to missing clearing of checked flag".
> 
> (or https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241105235654.15044-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com )
> 
> Normally, Greg would pick up the adjusted patch and apply it, and it
> would be backported without any problems, but if the backport of the
> adjusted patch I requested has been rejected, I would like to ask for
> your confirmation.
> 
> If it is a misunderstanding, I will wait for Greg's work, but is the
> process different from usual?

I got it now, thanks!

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ