[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024110608-shut-strenuous-04c8@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 07:34:17 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+d6ca2daf692c7a82f959@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: Patch "nilfs2: fix kernel bug due to missing clearing of
checked flag" failed to apply to v6.6-stable tree
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:21:39PM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> Hi Sasha
>
> About 6 hours ago, I posted an adjusted patch to the list (and to
> Greg) that allows for backporting of this patch to 6.6-stable and
> earlier.
>
> The patch is titled "[PATCH 4.19 5.4 5.10 5.15 6.1 6.6] nilfs2: fix
> kernel bug due to missing clearing of checked flag".
>
> (or https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241105235654.15044-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com )
>
> Normally, Greg would pick up the adjusted patch and apply it, and it
> would be backported without any problems, but if the backport of the
> adjusted patch I requested has been rejected, I would like to ask for
> your confirmation.
>
> If it is a misunderstanding, I will wait for Greg's work, but is the
> process different from usual?
I got it now, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists