[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241106042828-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 04:28:53 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: qiang4.zhang@...ux.intel.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Olivia Mackall <olivia@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Amit Shah <amit@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gonglei <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Chen, Jian Jun" <jian.jun.chen@...el.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Anton Yakovlev <anton.yakovlev@...nsynergy.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@...el.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio: only reset device and restore status if
needed in device resume
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 10:11:11AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 9:54 AM <qiang4.zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@...el.com>
> >
> > Virtio core unconditionally reset and restore status for all virtio
> > devices before calling restore method. This breaks some virtio drivers
> > which don't need to do anything in suspend and resume because they
> > just want to keep device state retained.
>
> The challenge is how can driver know device doesn't need rest.
I actually don't remember why do we do reset on restore. Do you?
> For example, PCI has no_soft_reset which has been done in the commit
> "virtio: Add support for no-reset virtio PCI PM".
>
> And there's a ongoing long discussion of adding suspend support in the
> virtio spec, then driver know it's safe to suspend/resume without
> reset.
>
> >
> > Virtio GPIO is a typical example. GPIO states should be kept unchanged
> > after suspend and resume (e.g. output pins keep driving the output) and
> > Virtio GPIO driver does nothing in freeze and restore methods. But the
> > reset operation in virtio_device_restore breaks this.
>
> Is this mandated by GPIO or virtio spec? If yes, let's quote the revelant part.
>
> >
> > Since some devices need reset in suspend and resume while some needn't,
> > create a new helper function for the original reset and status restore
> > logic so that virtio drivers can invoke it in their restore method
> > if necessary.
>
> How are those drivers classified?
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@...el.com>
>
> Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists