lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2d3778d-5fd6-49db-b418-b5411e617a0a@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:27:54 +0100
From: Olivier MOYSAN <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>
To: Luo Yifan <luoyifan@...s.chinamobile.com>, <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
        <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
        <tiwai@...e.com>
CC: <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: stm: Prevent potential division by zero in
 stm32_sai_mclk_round_rate()

Hi Luo,

On 11/6/24 02:46, Luo Yifan wrote:
> This patch checks if div is less than or equal to zero (div <= 0). If
> div is zero or negative, the function returns -EINVAL, ensuring the
> division operation (*prate / div) is safe to perform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luo Yifan <luoyifan@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
>   sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c b/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
> index 7bc4a96b7..2570daa3e 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
> @@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ static long stm32_sai_mclk_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>   	int div;
>   
>   	div = stm32_sai_get_clk_div(sai, *prate, rate);
> -	if (div < 0)
> -		return div;
> +	if (div <= 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	mclk->freq = *prate / div;
>   

Thanks for your patch. It looks fine, but I think that it has to
be extended.

In CR1 register, MCKDIV = 0 gives the same result as MCKDIV = 1.
But while MCKDIV = 0 is valid, for sure div = 0 is not valid.

I agree that that div = 0 has to be managed as an error
This could be rather handled in stm32_sai_get_clk_div() function itself,
by returning an error, if div is null.
This is relevant as we may also get an error on test "if (input_rate % 
div)".
I suggest to add a specific test and error message to handle this case 
in stm32_sai_get_clk_div().
Something like:
if (!div)) {
	dev_err(&sai->pdev->dev, "Invalid null divider\n");
	return -EINVAL;
}

BRs
Olivier





Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ