linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a06ed5e4-37a2-4295-986f-10977878c65b@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:28:28 +0100
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com, will@...nel.org,
 peterz@...radead.org, npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
 j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr, akiyks@...il.com,
 dlustig@...dia.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, urezki@...il.com,
 quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, frederic@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 lkmm@...ts.linux.dev, hernan.poncedeleon@...weicloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic
 and semantic tags



Am 11/5/2024 um 9:21 PM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 07:34:45AM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:38:26PM +0100, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 10/30/2024 um 12:41 AM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:15:46PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
>>>>>> Not all tags that are always there syntactically also provide semantic
>>>>>> membership in the corresponding set. For example, an 'acquire tag on a
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe:
>>>>>
>>>>> Not all annotated accesses provide the same semantic as their syntactic
>>>>> tags...
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Jonas, are you OK with this change?  If so, I can apply it on my next
>>>> rebase.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm ok with an extra s after semantics and a minor rephrase:
>>>
>>> Not all annotated accesses provide the semantics their syntactic
>>> tags would imply
>>>
>>> What do you think @Boqun ?
>>
>> Yes, of course! This looks good to me.
> 
> Please see below for what I currently have.  If there are no objections
> in a day or so, I will set up these five commits for the upcoming v6.13
> merge window.
> 
> The additional bit pointed out by Boqun [1] can be addressed by a
> separate commit.
> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZyAmlh5GDBsqY0sZ@Boquns-Mac-mini.local/

I'm confused, did I forget to add the fix to the capitalization issue 
discovered by Boqun to the fixed commit? I vividly remember typing git 
commit add ...


     jonas