lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241107163058.GD1297107@rocinante>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:30:58 +0900
From: Krzysztof Wilczy��ski <kw@...ux.com>
To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, "mani@...nel.org" <mani@...nel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Fix resume failure if no EP is connected at
 some platforms

Hello,

[...]
> > > If the changes aren't too involved, then I would rather fix it or drop
> > > the not needed code now, before we sent the Pull Request.
> > >
> > > So, feel free to sent a small patch against the current branch, or
> > > simply let me know how do you wish the current code to be changed, so
> > > I can do it against the current branch.
> > Thanks for your kindly reminder.
> > This clean up small patch is on the way.
> Here it is.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/11/7/409

Thank you!

That said, there here have been some concerns raised following a review of
the new patch, see:

  - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20241107084455.3623576-1-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com

Hence, I wonder whether we should drop this patch and then focus on
refinements to the new version, and perhaps, once its ready, then we
will include it—this might have to be for the next release at this
point, sadly.

Thoughts?

	Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ