[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nmWeyXkV0fhKwQESm10OdVuS7UGAux2N3ic2B0zNhuuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:50:50 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Eder Zulian <ezulian@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, williams@...hat.com,
ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me, a.hindborg@...nel.org,
aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu, jlelli@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] rust: helpers: Avoid raw_spin_lock initialization
for PREEMPT_RT
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 5:33 PM Eder Zulian <ezulian@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> As a note, at the time of writing, RUST support for x86_64 depends on
> !(MITIGATION_RETHUNK && KASAN) || RUSTC_VERSION >= 108300. Miguel Ojeda
> pointed out that this can be avoided with Rust 1.83, to be released in 3
> weeks (2024-11-28).
I was referring there to the "or" in that condition, i.e. the "||
RUSTC_VERSION >= 108300" part. In other words, it was just a comment I
made to explain in the other thread that disabling KASAN or RETHUNK is
not needed anymore when you use 1.83 in the future. :)
But that seems unrelated to the patch here, so normally you wouldn't
add it to the cover letter. Or am I missing something? Same for the
`make rustavailable` note below (i.e. `RUST=y` already implies that).
(Of course, no need to resend anything for this -- it is just a note
to clarify, and anyway the cover letter does not go into the
repository :)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists