[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zyz-wPkx7IokVl_J@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:54:08 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Loktionov, Aleksandr" <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] ptp: add control over HW timestamp latch
point
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 09:01:41AM +0000, Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
> >From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 3:05 AM
> >Richard has the final say but IMO packet timestamping config does not
> >belong to the PHC, rather ndo_hwtstamp_set.
Right, PHC means the hardware clock. That is distinct from the time
stamping settings. These belong to the network device, and are
contolled by using the SIOCSHWTSTAMP ioctl.
> Ok, thank you for feedback.
>
> Richard do you agree with Kuba?
IMO, setting the time stamp point should be with an ioctl in a way
similar way to SIOCSHWTSTAMP.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists