linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] bio_split() error handling rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26049689-238e-4f04-9a68-db002ed5c1e0@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 11:27:34 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, song@...nel.org,
 yukuai3@...wei.com, hch@....de
Cc: martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, hare@...e.de,
 Johannes.Thumshirn@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] bio_split() error handling rework

On 11/6/24 11:49 PM, John Garry wrote:
> On 31/10/2024 09:59, John Garry wrote:
> 
> Hi Jens,
> 
> Could you kindly consider picking up this series via the block tree?
> 
> Please note that the raid 0/1/10 atomic write support in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20241101144616.497602-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com/ depends on this series, so maybe you would also be willing to pick that one up (when it's fully reviewed). Or create a branch with all the block changes, like which was done for the atomic writes XFS support.

The series doesn't apply to for-6.13/block - the 3rd patch for bio
splitting conflicts with:

commit b35243a447b9fe6457fa8e1352152b818436ba5a
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Date:   Mon Aug 26 19:37:54 2024 +0200

    block: rework bio splitting

which was in long before for-6.13/block, which it's supposed to be based
on?

Please double check and resend a v4.

-- 
Jens Axboe