[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173100478595.985049.6746642229117398125.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 18:40:31 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/6] kselftest/arm64: Test floating point signal context restore in fp-stress
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 01:39:19 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> Currently we test signal delivery to the programs run by fp-stress but
> our signal handlers simply count the number of signals seen and don't do
> anything with the floating point state. The original fpsimd-test and
> sve-test programs had signal handlers called irritators which modify the
> live register state, verifying that we restore the signal context on
> return, but a combination of misleading comments and code resulted in
> them never being used and the equivalent handlers in the other tests
> being stubbed or omitted.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!
[1/6] kselftest/arm64: Correct misleading comments on fp-stress irritators
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/94de486e4215
[2/6] kselftest/arm64: Remove unused ADRs from irritator handlers
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/ffca567fef9c
[4/6] kselftest/arm64: Implement irritators for ZA and ZT
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/d65f27d240bb
[5/6] kselftest/arm64: Provide a SIGUSR1 handler in the kernel mode FP stress test
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/7368debf275a
[6/6] kselftest/arm64: Test signal handler state modification in fp-stress
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/ead1c35ce3b3
I did not merge patch 3 in case Mark R has any other comments.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists