linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/110] 5.10.229-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cf7063cc-fcfc-4137-af6e-9f1582041d95@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 11:10:14 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
 conor@...nel.org, hagar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/110] 5.10.229-rc1 review

On 11/6/24 04:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.229 release.
> There are 110 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:02:47 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.229-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>

On a 64-bit ARM kernel, this warning is seen:

In file included from ./include/linux/mm.h:30,
                  from ./include/linux/pagemap.h:8,
                  from ./include/linux/buffer_head.h:14,
                  from fs/udf/udfdecl.h:12,
                  from fs/udf/super.c:41:
fs/udf/super.c: In function 'udf_fill_partdesc_info':
./include/linux/overflow.h:70:15: warning: comparison of distinct 
pointer types lacks a cast
   (void) (&__a == &__b);   \
                ^~
fs/udf/super.c:1155:7: note: in expansion of macro 'check_add_overflow'
    if (check_add_overflow(map->s_partition_len,
        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-- 
Florian