[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241107235130.GW2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:51:30 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@...wei.com>
Cc: chandan.babu@...cle.com, dchinner@...hat.com, osandov@...com,
john.g.garry@...cle.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Some boundary error bugfix related to XFS fsmap.
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 05:21:55PM +0800, Zizhi Wo wrote:
>
>
> 在 2024/10/9 21:01, Zizhi Wo 写道:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Here are two patches that address fsmap statistics errors. I sent out
> > this version in August, and I hope someone can take some time to review
> > them. So friendly ping. Thanks in advance!
>
> friendly ping again( ̄。。 ̄)
Oops, sorry. Will go reply now.
--D
> >
> >
> > 在 2024/9/3 3:08, Darrick J. Wong 写道:
> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 07:24:55PM +0800, Zizhi Wo wrote:
> > > > friendly ping
> > >
> > > Sorry, I'm not going to get to this until late September.
> > >
> > > --D
> > >
> > > > 在 2024/8/26 11:10, Zizhi Wo 写道:
> > > > > Prior to this, I had already sent out a patchset related to xfs fsmap
> > > > > bugfix, which mainly introduced "info->end_daddr" to fix
> > > > > omitted extents[1]
> > > > > and Darrick had already sent out a patchbomb for merging
> > > > > into stable[2],
> > > > > which included my previous patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, I recently discovered two new fsmap problems...What
> > > > > follows is a
> > > > > brief description of them:
> > > > >
> > > > > Patch 1: In this scenario, fsmap lost one block count. The
> > > > > root cause is
> > > > > that during the calculation of highkey, the calculation of
> > > > > start_block is
> > > > > missing an increment by one, which leads to the last query missing one
> > > > > This problem is resolved by adding a sentinel node.
> > > > >
> > > > > Patch 2: In this scenario, the fsmap query for realtime
> > > > > deivce may display
> > > > > extra intervals. This is due to an extra increase in
> > > > > "end_rtb". The issue
> > > > > is resolved by adjusting the relevant calculations. And this
> > > > > patch depends
> > > > > on the previous patch that introduced "info->end_daddr".
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240819005320.304211-1-wozizhi@huawei.com/
> > > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/172437083728.56860.10056307551249098606.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs/
> > > > >
> > > > > Zizhi Wo (2):
> > > > > xfs: Fix missing block calculations in xfs datadev fsmap
> > > > > xfs: Fix incorrect parameter calculation in rt fsmap
> > > > >
> > > > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c | 4 +---
> > > > > fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c | 39
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > > > 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists