linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec: ucsi: glink: be more precise on orientation-aware ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024110729-trunks-hangup-01b5@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 06:18:48 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogeurs@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec: ucsi: glink: be more precise on
 orientation-aware ports

On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 05:45:55PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Instead of checking if any of the USB-C ports have orientation GPIO and
> thus is orientation-aware, check for the GPIO for the port being
> registered.

What is the visible affect of this change?

Does it fix an existing bug?

thanks,

greg k-h