[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZyxSdayBstBGhAeO@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:39:01 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mcgrof@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, petr.pavlu@...e.com,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, da.gomez@...sung.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
nathan@...nel.org, nicolas@...sle.eu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] module: Strict per-modname namespaces
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 08:02:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> It reserves and disallows imports on any "MODULE_${name}" namespace,
> while it implicitly adds the same namespace to every module.
Ah nice. This is pretty similar to what I want and had badly prototyped
a while ago.
> This allows exports targeted at specific modules and no others -- one
> random example included. I've hated the various kvm exports we've had
> for a while, and strictly limiting them to the kvm module helps
> alleviate some abuse potential.
And this was one of the targets on my list. Specific kunits tests
would be another category.
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate, MODULE_kvm);
I would have preferred a syntax that has the MODULE in the export macro
instead of the namespace, but I do care more about actually having the
functionality, and this seems way simpler than what I had.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists