[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024110747-kite-pacemaker-6216@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:47:05 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
Cc: geert+renesas@...der.be, magnus.damm@...il.com, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, g.liakhovetski@....de,
ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, ulrich.hecht+renesas@...il.com,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] serial: sh-sci: Check if TX data was written to
device in .tx_empty()
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 02:01:11PM +0200, Claudiu wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>
> On the Renesas RZ/G3S, when doing suspend to RAM, the uart_suspend_port()
> is called. The uart_suspend_port() calls 3 times the
> struct uart_port::ops::tx_empty() before shutting down the port.
>
> According to the documentation, the struct uart_port::ops::tx_empty()
> API tests whether the transmitter FIFO and shifter for the port is
> empty.
>
> The Renesas RZ/G3S SCIFA IP reports the number of data units stored in the
> transmit FIFO through the FDR (FIFO Data Count Register). The data units
> in the FIFOs are written in the shift register and transmitted from there.
> The TEND bit in the Serial Status Register reports if the data was
> transmitted from the shift register.
>
> In the previous code, in the tx_empty() API implemented by the sh-sci
> driver, it is considered that the TX is empty if the hardware reports the
> TEND bit set and the number of data units in the FIFO is zero.
>
> According to the HW manual, the TEND bit has the following meaning:
>
> 0: Transmission is in the waiting state or in progress.
> 1: Transmission is completed.
>
> It has been noticed that when opening the serial device w/o using it and
> then switch to a power saving mode, the tx_empty() call in the
> uart_port_suspend() function fails, leading to the "Unable to drain
> transmitter" message being printed on the console. This is because the
> TEND=0 if nothing has been transmitted and the FIFOs are empty. As the
> TEND=0 has double meaning (waiting state, in progress) we can't
> determined the scenario described above.
>
> Add a software workaround for this. This sets a variable if any data has
> been sent on the serial console (when using PIO) or if the DMA callback has
> been called (meaning something has been transmitted).
>
> Fixes: 73a19e4c0301 ("serial: sh-sci: Add DMA support.")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> index df523c744423..8e2d534401fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ struct sci_port {
> int rx_trigger;
> struct timer_list rx_fifo_timer;
> int rx_fifo_timeout;
> + atomic_t first_time_tx;
Don't use an atomic variable for an informational thing like this, it is
racy and doesn't work properly. Either use a real lock (because you
care about the locking stuff here), or just use a boolean and live with
any potential races.
> u16 hscif_tot;
>
> bool has_rtscts;
> @@ -850,6 +851,7 @@ static void sci_transmit_chars(struct uart_port *port)
> {
> struct tty_port *tport = &port->state->port;
> unsigned int stopped = uart_tx_stopped(port);
> + struct sci_port *s = to_sci_port(port);
> unsigned short status;
> unsigned short ctrl;
> int count;
> @@ -885,6 +887,7 @@ static void sci_transmit_chars(struct uart_port *port)
> }
>
> sci_serial_out(port, SCxTDR, c);
> + atomic_set(&s->first_time_tx, 1);
>
> port->icount.tx++;
> } while (--count > 0);
> @@ -1241,6 +1244,8 @@ static void sci_dma_tx_complete(void *arg)
> if (kfifo_len(&tport->xmit_fifo) < WAKEUP_CHARS)
> uart_write_wakeup(port);
>
> + atomic_set(&s->first_time_tx, 1);
> +
> if (!kfifo_is_empty(&tport->xmit_fifo)) {
> s->cookie_tx = 0;
> schedule_work(&s->work_tx);
> @@ -2076,6 +2081,10 @@ static unsigned int sci_tx_empty(struct uart_port *port)
> {
> unsigned short status = sci_serial_in(port, SCxSR);
> unsigned short in_tx_fifo = sci_txfill(port);
> + struct sci_port *s = to_sci_port(port);
> +
> + if (!atomic_read(&s->first_time_tx))
> + return TIOCSER_TEMT;
See, what happens here if the value changes right after you check it?
Being an atomic doesn't mean anything :(
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists