[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37f104c4-ddbe-4ee0-9c82-88afff75a2d4@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 11:43:29 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Grégory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: set `#clock-cells =
<1>` for all compatibles
On 06/11/2024 17:03, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Some compatibles expose a single clock. For those, we used to let them
> using `#clock-cells = <0>` (ie <&olb> reference rather than <&olb 0>).
>
> Switch away from that: enforce a cell for all compatibles. This is more
> straight forward, and avoids devicetree changes whenever a compatible
> goes from exposing a single clock to multiple ones. Also, dt-bindings
> get simpler.
>
> *This is an ABI break*. Change it while EyeQ5 platform support is at its
> infancy, without any user. More clocks might hide in each OLB as some
> registers are still unknown.
>
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists