lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5a6zh5vmdsqyhfy3qdlirqxzhdu44a6ika3uoks5txm3ljm3m@2fht2vmgragv>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 13:04:47 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogeurs@...ux.intel.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, 
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: typec: ucsi: glink: fix off-by-one in
 connector_status

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 06:17:17AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 05:45:54PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > UCSI connector's indices start from 1 up to 3, PMIC_GLINK_MAX_PORTS.
> > Correct the condition in the pmic_glink_ucsi_connector_status()
> > callback, fixing Type-C orientation reporting for the third USB-C
> > connector.
> > 
> > Fixes: 76716fd5bf09 ("usb: typec: ucsi: glink: move GPIO reading into connector_status callback")
> > Reported-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
> a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
> to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
> writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
> created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
> in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
> kernel tree.
> 
> You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
> as indicated below:
> 
> - You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
>   older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
>   signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
>   applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
>   follow the documented rules in the
>   Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
>   this.

I will resend it with CC:stable later today.

> 
> If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
> how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
> Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
> from other developers.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h's patch email bot

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ