[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241107110649.3980193-4-wozizhi@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 19:06:47 +0800
From: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@...wei.com>
To: <netfs@...ts.linux.dev>, <dhowells@...hat.com>, <jlayton@...nel.org>,
<brauner@...nel.org>
CC: <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>, <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<zhujia.zj@...edance.com>, <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<wozizhi@...wei.com>, <libaokun1@...wei.com>, <yangerkun@...wei.com>,
<houtao1@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] cachefiles: Clean up in cachefiles_commit_tmpfile()
Currently, cachefiles_commit_tmpfile() will only be called if object->flags
is set to CACHEFILES_OBJECT_USING_TMPFILE. Only cachefiles_create_file()
and cachefiles_invalidate_cookie() set this flag. Both of these functions
replace object->file with the new tmpfile, and both are called by
fscache_cookie_state_machine(), so there are no concurrency issues.
So the equation "d_backing_inode(dentry) == file_inode(object->file)" in
cachefiles_commit_tmpfile() will never hold true according to the above
conditions. This patch removes this part of the redundant code and does not
involve any other logical changes.
Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@...wei.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
fs/cachefiles/namei.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
index 2b3f9935dbb4..7cf59713f0f7 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
@@ -691,11 +691,6 @@ bool cachefiles_commit_tmpfile(struct cachefiles_cache *cache,
}
if (!d_is_negative(dentry)) {
- if (d_backing_inode(dentry) == file_inode(object->file)) {
- success = true;
- goto out_dput;
- }
-
ret = cachefiles_unlink(volume->cache, object, fan, dentry,
FSCACHE_OBJECT_IS_STALE);
if (ret < 0)
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists