linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net 4/4] virtio_net: Update rss when set queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41b0155f-bec4-4563-a92c-b30b0f5f9997@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:39:51 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, Philo Lu <lulie@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
 xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 andrew@...nix.com, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] virtio_net: Update rss when set queue

On 11/5/24 21:31, Joe Damato wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 04:57:06PM +0800, Philo Lu wrote:
>> RSS configuration should be updated with queue number. In particular, it
>> should be updated when (1) rss enabled and (2) default rss configuration
>> is used without user modification.
>>
>> During rss command processing, device updates queue_pairs using
>> rss.max_tx_vq. That is, the device updates queue_pairs together with
>> rss, so we can skip the sperate queue_pairs update
>> (VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET below) and return directly.
>>
>> Also remove the `vi->has_rss ?` check when setting vi->rss.max_tx_vq,
>> because this is not used in the other hash_report case.
>>
>> Fixes: c7114b1249fa ("drivers/net/virtio_net: Added basic RSS support.")
>> Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 59d9fdf562e0..189afad3ffaa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -3394,15 +3394,59 @@ static void virtnet_ack_link_announce(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>  		dev_warn(&vi->dev->dev, "Failed to ack link announce.\n");
>>  }
>>  
>> +static bool virtnet_commit_rss_command(struct virtnet_info *vi);
>> +
>> +static void virtnet_rss_update_by_qpairs(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
>> +{
>> +	u32 indir_val = 0;
>> +	int i = 0;
>> +
>> +	for (; i < vi->rss_indir_table_size; ++i) {
>> +		indir_val = ethtool_rxfh_indir_default(i, queue_pairs);
>> +		vi->rss.indirection_table[i] = indir_val;
>> +	}
>> +	vi->rss.max_tx_vq = queue_pairs;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
>>  {
>>  	struct virtio_net_ctrl_mq *mq __free(kfree) = NULL;
>> -	struct scatterlist sg;
>> +	struct virtio_net_ctrl_rss old_rss;
>>  	struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>> +	struct scatterlist sg;
>>  
>>  	if (!vi->has_cvq || !virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ))
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>> +	/* Firstly check if we need update rss. Do updating if both (1) rss enabled and
>> +	 * (2) no user configuration.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * During rss command processing, device updates queue_pairs using rss.max_tx_vq. That is,
>> +	 * the device updates queue_pairs together with rss, so we can skip the sperate queue_pairs
>> +	 * update (VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET below) and return directly.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (vi->has_rss && !netif_is_rxfh_configured(dev)) {
> 
> Does there need to be an error case when:
> 
> vi->has_rss && netif_is_rxfh_configured(dev)
> 
> to return EINVAL? I noted that other drivers don't let users adjust
> the queue count and return error in this case.

AFAICS the above is orthogonal to this patch - i.e. lack of check is
pre-existing and not introduced here. I'm not 110% sure the lack of
check is illegit, but I think it should eventually handled with a
separate patch/series.

Thanks,

Paolo