[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h68jclre.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 22:43:17 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Christophe
Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, Danny Tsen
<dtsen@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aes-gcm-p10: Use the correct bit to test for P10
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de> writes:
> A hwcap feature bit is passed to cpu_has_feature, resulting in testing
> for CPU_FTR_MMCRA instead of the 3.1 platform revision.
Ouch. Good find.
Notably all IBM Power CPUs have MMCRA set, so the feature test is
essentially a nop.
> Fixes: c954b252dee9 ("crypto: powerpc/p10-aes-gcm - Register modules as SIMD")
^ which is only in linux-next so no stable tag needed.
> Reported-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/crypto/aes-gcm-p10-glue.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> (powerpc)
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/crypto/aes-gcm-p10-glue.c b/arch/powerpc/crypto/aes-gcm-p10-glue.c
> index e52629334cf8..1f8b67775658 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/crypto/aes-gcm-p10-glue.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/crypto/aes-gcm-p10-glue.c
> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int __init p10_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (!cpu_has_feature(PPC_FEATURE2_ARCH_3_1))
> + if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> return 0;
>
> ret = simd_register_aeads_compat(gcm_aes_algs,
> --
> 2.46.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists