[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3319cd6e.b980.1930c63b1e5.Coremail.00107082@163.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 23:28:00 +0800 (CST)
From: "David Wang" <00107082@....com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: richard.henderson@...aro.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, guoren@...nel.org, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
kernel@...0n.name, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
deller@....de, mpe@...erman.id.au, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, dalias@...c.org,
glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de, davem@...emloft.net,
andreas@...sler.com, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, chris@...kel.net,
jcmvbkbc@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc: performance: replace seq_printf with
seq_put_decimal_ull_width
Hi,
At 2024-11-08 22:25:13, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>David!
>
>On Sun, Nov 03 2024 at 16:05, David Wang wrote:
>
>$Subject: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc: performance: ...
>
>That's not a valid subsystem prefix.
copy that~
>
>> seq_printf is costy, when stress reading /proc/interrupts, profiling indicates
>> seq_printf takes about ~47% of show_interrupts samples:
>
>Also please follow the documentation for denoting functions in change
>logs:
>
>https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#function-references-in-changelogs
>
copy that~
>> arch/alpha/kernel/irq.c | 8 +--
>> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 3 +-
>> arch/csky/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/parisc/kernel/irq.c | 34 ++++++------
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 44 ++++++++--------
>> arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 3 +-
>> arch/sh/kernel/irq.c | 4 +-
>> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_32.c | 12 ++---
>> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c | 4 +-
>> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> arch/xtensa/kernel/irq.c | 2 +-
>> arch/xtensa/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
>> kernel/irq/proc.c | 6 ++-
>
>There is no dependency on these changes. So please split them up into
>seperate patches for core and the individual architectures.an
Thanks for all the review, I will make a patchset for this.
>
>Thanks,
>
> tglx
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists