linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Fix build with stricter assemblers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fcc92dc9-9a03-4db7-964b-0f7cd1490a7d@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:34:38 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Fix build with stricter assemblers

On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 03:29:37PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 03:27:58PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> > > -	smstart
> > > +	smstart_za

> > And is smstop ok for assemblers? I think I got the error first on
> > smstop with my toolchain.

> Ah, we already have a macro for that. Let me check the error I got,
> maybe I got confused (with the multitude of other warnings ;)).

Yeah, smstop is already used in those programs (in 'barf') so they
should never have complied if the macro wasn't working.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)