linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] ALSA: machine: update documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ldxtwlh0.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:53:47 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ALSA: machine: update documentation

[I suspect that your HTML email will keep your response off the list -
don't do that.]

anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com> writes:

> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 11:29 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
>  anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com> writes:
>  > +In the above struct, dai’s are registered using names but you can pass
>  > +either dai name or device tree node but not both. Also, names used here
>  > +for cpu/codec/platform dais should be globally unique.
>  > +
>  > +Additionaly below example macro can be used to register cpu, codec and
>  > +platform dai::
>  > +
>  > +SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEFS(wm2200_cpu_dsp,
>  > +     DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CPU("samsung-i2s.0")),
>  > +     DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CODEC("spi0.0", "wm0010-sdi1")),
>  > +     DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_PLATFORM("samsung-i2s.0")));
>  > +
>
>  This will not give you the literal block you were hoping for.  Please
>  actually build the docs after making changes and look at the results.
>
> I was not hoping for literally code block but rather just a tab. I just pasted Bagas comment as I
> thought it is better way to say that about the change. 

The "::" you added above introduces a literal block.  Yes, that is what
you were hoping for.

jon