[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zy52q5U8p55DtdJw@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:38:03 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com, sched-ext@...a.com,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>,
Changwoo Min <multics69@...il.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.13 2/2] sched_ext: Enable the ops
breather and eject BPF scheduler on softlockup
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 11:49:04AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 2 x Intel Sapphire Rapids machines with 224 logical CPUs, a poorly
> behaving BPF scheduler can live-lock the system by making multiple CPUs bang
> on the same DSQ to the point where soft-lockup detection triggers before
> SCX's own watchdog can take action. It also seems possible that the machine
> can be live-locked enough to prevent scx_ops_helper, which is an RT task,
> from running in a timely manner.
>
> Implement scx_softlockup() which is called when three quarters of
> soft-lockup threshold has passed. The function immediately enables the ops
> breather and triggers an ops error to initiate ejection of the BPF
> scheduler.
>
> The previous and this patch combined enable the kernel to reliably recover
> the system from live-lock conditions that can be triggered by a poorly
> behaving BPF scheduler on Intel dual socket systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Applying 1-2 to sched_ext/for-6.13.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists