[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2939664d-e38d-4ac4-b8cf-3ef60c5fd5c6@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:03:45 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: mrpre <mrpre@....com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, jakub@...udflare.com, davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.orgc, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...adoghq.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix recursive lock when verdict program return
SK_PASS
On 11/6/24 4:44 AM, mrpre wrote:
> When the stream_verdict program returns SK_PASS, it places the received skb
> into its own receive queue, but a recursive lock eventually occurs, leading
> to an operating system deadlock. This issue has been present since v6.9.
>
> '''
> sk_psock_strp_data_ready
> write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
> strp_data_ready
> strp_read_sock
> read_sock -> tcp_read_sock
> strp_recv
> cb.rcv_msg -> sk_psock_strp_read
> # now stream_verdict return SK_PASS without peer sock assign
> __SK_PASS = sk_psock_map_verd(SK_PASS, NULL)
> sk_psock_verdict_apply
> sk_psock_skb_ingress_self
> sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue
> sk_psock_data_ready
> read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock) <= dead lock
>
> '''
>
> This topic has been discussed before, but it has not been fixed.
> Previous discussion:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6684a5864ec86_403d20898@john.notmuch
Is the selftest included in this link still useful to reproduce this bug?
If yes, please include that also.
>
> Fixes: 6648e613226e ("bpf, skmsg: Fix NULL pointer dereference in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue")
> Reported-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...adoghq.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@....com>
Please also use the real name in the author (i.e. the email sender). The patch
needs a real author name also. I had manually fixed one of your earlier
lock_sock fix before applying.
pw-bot: cr
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
The patch and the earlier discussion make sense to me.
John and JakubS, please help to take another look in the next respin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists