lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokFUpQyHYO017kOn-Jbt0CFZ1GuxoG3N-fenWJ_poW=4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:58:37 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, ionela.voinescu@....com, sudeep.holla@....com, 
	will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, rafael@...nel.org, 
	sumitg@...dia.com, yang@...amperecomputing.com, 
	vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com, lihuisong@...wei.com, 
	zhanjie9@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] cpufreq: Introduce an optional cpuinfo_avg_freq
 sysfs entry

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 13:30, Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com> wrote:

> We need a way to discover whether the new sysfs attrib is to be enabled or not.

Ahh, this is too much trouble to make it optional then :)

> I guess I could change the signature for arch_freq_get_on_cpu to return an error
> if that functionality is not supported for given policy ?

That would be more controversial I guess as we may want an unsigned int return
type for frequency.

I think we can do two things here:
- Just enable the sysfs attribute all the time ?
- Make it optional based on some static cpufreq driver flag ?

I would just enable it for everyone I guess.

--
Viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ