lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79ae7e16-5131-b517-96fd-0d477fdbf3b5@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:41:02 +0800
From: liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	<jgg@...dia.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
	<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
CC: <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 3/4] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: register debugfs for hisilicon
 migration driver

On 2024/11/7 0:50, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Longfang,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on awilliam-vfio/next]
> [also build test ERROR on awilliam-vfio/for-linus linus/master v6.12-rc6 next-20241106]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Longfang-Liu/hisi_acc_vfio_pci-extract-public-functions-for-container_of/20241106-182913
> base:   https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio.git next
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241106100343.21593-4-liulongfang%40huawei.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v13 3/4] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: register debugfs for hisilicon migration driver
> config: loongarch-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241107/202411070027.p1xVCxxs-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241107/202411070027.p1xVCxxs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411070027.p1xVCxxs-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c: In function 'hisi_acc_vf_dev_read':
>>> drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c:1397:9: error: too many arguments to function 'seq_puts'
>     1397 |         seq_puts(seq,
>          |         ^~~~~~~~
>    In file included from include/linux/debugfs.h:16,
>                     from include/linux/hisi_acc_qm.h:7,
>                     from drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c:9:
>    include/linux/seq_file.h:122:29: note: declared here
>      122 | static __always_inline void seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const char *s)
>          |                             ^~~~~~~~
>    drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c: In function 'hisi_acc_vf_migf_read':
>    drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c:1429:9: error: too many arguments to function 'seq_puts'
>     1429 |         seq_puts(seq, "migrate data length: %lu\n", debug_migf->total_length);
>          |         ^~~~~~~~
>    include/linux/seq_file.h:122:29: note: declared here
>      122 | static __always_inline void seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const char *s)
>          |                             ^~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> vim +/seq_puts +1397 drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> 
>   1364	
>   1365	static int hisi_acc_vf_dev_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *data)
>   1366	{
>   1367		struct device *vf_dev = seq->private;
>   1368		struct vfio_pci_core_device *core_device = dev_get_drvdata(vf_dev);
>   1369		struct vfio_device *vdev = &core_device->vdev;
>   1370		struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev = hisi_acc_get_vf_dev(vdev);
>   1371		size_t vf_data_sz = offsetofend(struct acc_vf_data, padding);
>   1372		struct acc_vf_data *vf_data;
>   1373		int ret;
>   1374	
>   1375		mutex_lock(&hisi_acc_vdev->open_mutex);
>   1376		ret = hisi_acc_vf_debug_check(seq, vdev);
>   1377		if (ret) {
>   1378			mutex_unlock(&hisi_acc_vdev->open_mutex);
>   1379			return ret;
>   1380		}
>   1381	
>   1382		mutex_lock(&hisi_acc_vdev->state_mutex);
>   1383		vf_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*vf_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>   1384		if (!vf_data) {
>   1385			ret = -ENOMEM;
>   1386			goto mutex_release;
>   1387		}
>   1388	
>   1389		vf_data->vf_qm_state = hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm_state;
>   1390		ret = vf_qm_read_data(&hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm, vf_data);
>   1391		if (ret)
>   1392			goto migf_err;
>   1393	
>   1394		seq_hex_dump(seq, "Dev Data:", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
>   1395			     (const void *)vf_data, vf_data_sz, false);
>   1396	
>> 1397		seq_puts(seq,
>   1398			 "guest driver load: %u\n"
>   1399			 "data size: %lu\n",
>   1400			 hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm_state,
>   1401			 sizeof(struct acc_vf_data));
>   1402	
>   1403	migf_err:
>   1404		kfree(vf_data);
>   1405	mutex_release:
>   1406		mutex_unlock(&hisi_acc_vdev->state_mutex);
>   1407		mutex_unlock(&hisi_acc_vdev->open_mutex);
>   1408	
>   1409		return ret;
>   1410	}
>   1411	
> 
OK, I will fix it using seq_printf() in the next version

Thanks,
Longfang.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ