lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0Ud7XrzqAe2rb_MeXEZwRLJxJ_Z2P3=OD+rfRmVOuuLVfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 16:02:50 -0800
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, 
	Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v23 0/7] Replace page_frag with page_frag_cache (Part-1)

On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 3:57 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:53:35 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> > This is part 1 of "Replace page_frag with page_frag_cache",
> > which mainly contain refactoring and optimization for the
> > implementation of page_frag API before the replacing.
>
> Looks like Alex is happy with all of these patches. Since
> page_frag_cache is primarily used in networking I think it's
> okay for us to apply it but I wanted to ask if anyone:
>  - thinks this shouldn't go in;
>  - needs more time to review;
>  - prefers to take it via their own tree.

Yeah. I was happy with the set. Just curious about the numbers as they
hadn't been updated, but I am satisfied with the numbers provided
after I pointed that out.

- Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ