[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7542399d-87c5-4f1c-9d09-6a6f96d148da@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:10:48 +0100
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com, dlustig@...dia.com,
frederic@...nel.org, hernan.poncedeleon@...weicloud.com,
j.alglave@....ac.uk, joel@...lfernandes.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lkmm@...ts.linux.dev, luc.maranget@...ia.fr, npiggin@...il.com,
parri.andrea@...il.com, paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu, urezki@...il.com,
will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic
and semantic tags
Am 11/7/2024 um 11:51 AM schrieb Akira Yokosawa:
> Jonas, despite the CC, your message has not made my gmail mbox, not even
> the spam folder.
> I'm replying using lore's reply link. >
> As Paul mentioned elsewhere, the [v5] patch misses tags from Boqun at the moment.
>
So if I supply a new revision of a patch, should I include in all the
reviewed-by of the previous patch?
I hadn't done that before (because I thought I should not add other
people's tags especially if they hadn't reviewed that specific
revision), so we may be missing *a lot* of reviewed-by...
If this is the case, I'll try to scour through the previous e-mails and
add all the missing reviewed-by.
Best wishes,
jonas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists