linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/349] 4.19.323-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYs8jLY9t=u+rBJ8e18LbpB10ortb6q8j0r8yRPw6-J=JA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 09:22:09 +0000
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hagar@...rosoft.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/349] 4.19.323-rc2 review

On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 06:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.323 release.
> There are 349 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 09 Nov 2024 06:33:12 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.323-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

NOTE:
-----
As other reported the following build warnings were noticed.

fs/udf/inode.c:2175:7: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types
('typeof (sizeof(struct allocExtDesc)) *' (aka 'unsigned int *') and
'typeof (&alen)' (aka 'int *')) [-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]
 2175 |                 if (check_add_overflow(sizeof(struct allocExtDesc),
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 2176 |
le32_to_cpu(header->lengthAllocDescs), &alen))
      |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/overflow.h:61:15: note: expanded from macro 'check_add_overflow'
   61 |         (void) (&__a == __d);                   \
      |                 ~~~~ ^  ~~~
1 warning generated.

Links:
 - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2oVnF1lNXvgGOE2tMmzH9cSJwwP/

## Build
* kernel: 4.19.323-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 9e8e2cfe2de91cde6ce1f79021b5115f44355ce8
* git describe: v4.19.322-350-g9e8e2cfe2de9
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.322-350-g9e8e2cfe2de9

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.19.321-96-g00a71bfa9b89)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.19.321-96-g00a71bfa9b89)

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.19.321-96-g00a71bfa9b89)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.19.321-96-g00a71bfa9b89)

## Test result summary
total: 24015, pass: 18823, fail: 189, skip: 4969, xfail: 34

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 102 total, 96 passed, 6 failed
* arm64: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed
* i386: 15 total, 12 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 23 total, 17 passed, 6 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kunit
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org