[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zy3zd12CoUp6dC2q@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:18:15 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
Cc: UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: sparx5: do some preparation work
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 08:16:39PM +0100, Daniel Machon wrote:
> @@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ enum sparx5_feature {
>
> #define SPARX5_MAX_PTP_ID 512
>
> +#define SPX5_ETYPE_TAG_C 0x8100
Maybe at some point consider using ETH_P_8021Q which is defined in
uapi/linux/if_ether.h ?
> +#define SPX5_ETYPE_TAG_S 0x88a8
Maybe also consider adding ETH_P_8021AD to uapi/linux/if_ether.h ?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists