[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c20e9a2-4ab3-47b0-88cd-a68f7d5c6515@blaize.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:18:28 +0000
From: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos@...ize.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
James Cowgill <james.cowgill@...ize.com>,
Matt Redfearn <matthew.redfearn@...ize.com>,
Neil Jones <neil.jones@...ize.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl" <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"hvilleneuve@...onoff.com" <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
"andre.przywara@....com" <andre.przywara@....com>,
"rafal@...ecki.pl" <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
"andersson@...nel.org" <andersson@...nel.org>,
"konrad.dybcio@...aro.org" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"nm@...com" <nm@...com>,
"neil.armstrong@...aro.org" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
"nfraprado@...labora.com" <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
"johan+linaro@...nel.org" <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: Add Blaize vendor prefix
On 08/11/2024 10:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/11/2024 11:31, Niko Pasaloukos wrote:
>> Blaize, Inc. (www.blaize.com) is a SoC manufacturer with integrated
>> programmable Graph-Streaming-Processors for AI and ML.
>>
>> Resolves: PESW-2604
> What is this? The tag and the meaning? How does it matter for the upstream?
Hi Krzysztof,
First of all, thank you very much for your fast review.
Apologies for not rebasing to the correct branch and having so many people in the list.
Also, adding the --no-git-fallback reduced the list even more. Thank you very much.
Apologies for not deleting the internal tags and causing confusion. V5 will have all these fixed.
Best regards,
Niko
>
> I do not see you using b4 so I do no understand why you Cc stale
> addresses. Standard reply - please fix your process:
>
> <form letter>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument, so you will
> not CC people just because they made one commit years ago). It might
> happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated
> entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux
> kernel.
>
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
> fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
> patches to the patchset.
> </form letter>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists