[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b262ff19-dc57-4a72-9395-25d81e48a476@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:11:29 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] hwmon: tmp108: Add help function
tmp108_common_probe()
On 11/8/24 15:55, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/8/24 14:26, Frank Li wrote:
>> Add help function tmp108_common_probe() to pave road to support i3c for
>
> help -> helper
>
>> P3T1085(NXP) chip.
>>
>> Using dev_err_probe() simple code.
>
> Use dev_err_probe() to simplify the code.
>
>>
>> Add compatible string "nxp,p3t1085".
>>
>
> This is borderline and problematic. First, it is the one functional change,
> and second, that functional change is not mentioned in the subject. At the very
> least it needs to be mentioned in the subject. I would, however, prefer two
> separate patches, even if that is just a one-liner.
>
I forgot: The additional chip support should also be mentioned in Kconfig and in
Documentation/hwmon/tmp108.rst.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists