[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241109-fix-oops-__smc_diag_dump-v1-1-1c55a3e54ad4@iiitd.ac.in>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 11:58:34 +0530
From: Manas via B4 Relay <devnull+manas18244.iiitd.ac.in@...nel.org>
To: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, Jan Karcher <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>, Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Anup Sharma <anupnewsmail@...il.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Manas <manas18244@...td.ac.in>
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused function parameter in __smc_diag_dump
From: Manas <manas18244@...td.ac.in>
The last parameter in __smc_diag_dump (struct nlattr *bc) is unused.
There is only one instance of this function being called and its passed
with a NULL value in place of bc.
Signed-off-by: Manas <manas18244@...td.ac.in>
---
The last parameter in __smc_diag_dump (struct nlattr *bc) is unused.
There is only one instance of this function being called and its passed
with a NULL value in place of bc.
Though, the compiler (gcc) optimizes it. Looking at the object dump of
vmlinux (via `objdump -D vmlinux`), a new function clone
(__smc_diag_dump.constprop.0) is added which removes this parameter from
calling convention altogether.
ffffffff8a701770 <__smc_diag_dump.constprop.0>:
ffffffff8a701770: 41 57 push %r15
ffffffff8a701772: 41 56 push %r14
ffffffff8a701774: 41 55 push %r13
ffffffff8a701776: 41 54 push %r12
There are 5 parameters in original function, but in the cloned function
only 4.
I believe this patch also fixes this oops bug[1], which arises in the
same function __smc_diag_dump. But I couldn't verify it further. Can
someone please test this?
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=271fed3ed6f24600c364
---
net/smc/smc_diag.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_diag.c b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
index 6fdb2d96777ad704c394709ec845f9ddef5e599a..8f7bd40f475945171a0afa5a2cce12d9aa2b1eb4 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_diag.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
@@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ static int smc_diag_msg_attrs_fill(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
static int __smc_diag_dump(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct netlink_callback *cb,
- const struct smc_diag_req *req,
- struct nlattr *bc)
+ const struct smc_diag_req *req)
{
struct smc_sock *smc = smc_sk(sk);
struct smc_diag_fallback fallback;
@@ -199,7 +198,6 @@ static int smc_diag_dump_proto(struct proto *prot, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct smc_diag_dump_ctx *cb_ctx = smc_dump_context(cb);
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
int snum = cb_ctx->pos[p_type];
- struct nlattr *bc = NULL;
struct hlist_head *head;
int rc = 0, num = 0;
struct sock *sk;
@@ -214,7 +212,7 @@ static int smc_diag_dump_proto(struct proto *prot, struct sk_buff *skb,
continue;
if (num < snum)
goto next;
- rc = __smc_diag_dump(sk, skb, cb, nlmsg_data(cb->nlh), bc);
+ rc = __smc_diag_dump(sk, skb, cb, nlmsg_data(cb->nlh));
if (rc < 0)
goto out;
next:
---
base-commit: 59b723cd2adbac2a34fc8e12c74ae26ae45bf230
change-id: 20241109-fix-oops-__smc_diag_dump-06ab3e9d39f4
Best regards,
--
Manas <manas18244@...td.ac.in>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists