[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vy2bqhyyfvi5kum3sfefva7lquw2ixqmstx355egkqbplmte4y@5hovbiuwmqqk>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 11:43:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: Add SGMII
port support to KSZ9477 switch
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 05:56:32PM -0800, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Tristram Ha <tristram.ha@...rochip.com>
>
> Update the KSZ9477 switch example to use SFP cage for SGMII support.
Why? That's just an example. Why do we want it? Why no changes to
bindings? Your commit msg must answer to all these.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists