linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Fix missing address/size cells warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zy9B3wjv_ODlKBxW@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:05:03 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>,
	Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	stable+noautosel@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Fix missing address/size
 cells warnings

On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 12:49:16AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 at 00:05, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > The commit 4b28a0dec185 ("of: WARN on deprecated #address-cells/#size-cells
> > handling") now forces all parent nodes to describe the #adress-cells
> > and #size-cells, otherwise it will throw a warning.
> >
> > Note that this patch is currently only in -next.
> >
> > Fix all warnings on the X Elite by adding these two properties to all
> > parent nodes that don't have them.
> 
> The individual patches are incorrect per my understanding. None of
> those child nodes use addressing, so adding #address-cells = <1> is
> incorrect. Maybe it should be #address-cells = <0>, but that looks a
> bit ridiculous to me.

Yeah, the warnings are bogus. Rob merged a fix last night:

	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241108193547.2647986-2-robh@kernel.org/

so this should be resolved in linux-next on Monday or so.

Johan