lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zy7DWssEuFN6Zehi@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:05:14 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Changwoo Min <multics69@...il.com>
Cc: arighi@...dia.com, void@...ifault.com, changwoo@...lia.com,
	kernel-dev@...lia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: add a missing rcu_read_lock/unlock pair at
 scx_select_cpu_dfl()

Hello,

On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 10:54:20AM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
...
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 6ff501a18b88..830a21d666e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -3320,9 +3320,11 @@ static s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu,
>  		if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_SCHED_MC, &scx_selcpu_topo_llc)) {
>  			struct sched_domain *sd;
>  
> +			rcu_read_lock();
>  			sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, prev_cpu));
>  			if (sd)
>  				llc_cpus = sched_domain_span(sd);
> +			rcu_read_unlock();

Shouldn't RCU critical section cover the places where llc_cpus is deref'd?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ