lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241110121221.GAZzCjJU1AUfV8vR3Q@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 13:12:21 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>
Cc: "Melody (Huibo) Wang" <huibo.wang@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, Thomas.Lendacky@....com,
	nikunj@....com, Santosh.Shukla@....com, Vasant.Hegde@....com,
	Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, David.Kaplan@....com, x86@...nel.org,
	hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
	pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [sos-linux-ext-patches] [RFC 05/14] x86/apic: Initialize APIC ID
 for Secure AVIC

On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 09:25:34AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> Given that in step 3, hv uses "apic_id" (provided by guest) to find the
> corresponding vCPU information, "apic_id" and "hv_apic_id" need to match.
> Mismatch is not considered as a fatal event for guest (snp_abort() is not
> triggered) and a warning is raise,

What is it considered then and why does the warning even exist?

What can anyone do about it?

If you don't kill the guest, what should the guest owner do if she sees that
warning?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ