[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241110134230.GR4507@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 13:42:30 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: wireguard: load nf_conntrack if it's not
present
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 02:44:18AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Some distros may not load nf_conntrack by default, which will cause
> subsequent nf_conntrack settings to fail. Let's load this module if it's
> not loaded by default.
>
> Fixes: e7096c131e51 ("net: WireGuard secure network tunnel")
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh
> index 405ff262ca93..508b391e8d9a 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ cleanup() {
> orig_message_cost="$(< /proc/sys/net/core/message_cost)"
> trap cleanup EXIT
> printf 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/message_cost
> +lsmod | grep -q nf_conntrack || modprobe nf_conntrack
Hi Hangbin,
As modprobe should be idempotent both for the case were nf_conntrack is
built-in (I'm unsure if that case can ever occur) and the module has
already been inserted, I think you simply use:
modprobe nf_conntrack
Of course, if nf_conntrack isn't available at all, then this will fail.
But that was the case with your patch too. And so I assume it is intended.
>
> ip netns del $netns0 2>/dev/null || true
> ip netns del $netns1 2>/dev/null || true
> --
> 2.46.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists