[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m7x526sv5krgt4t2whn5ykyktoz5u7ihsxv3qa5yue3ucbk6lb@37spwsmlcylm>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:14:24 -0500
From: Aren <aren@...cevolution.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>, Barnabás Czémán <trabarni@...il.com>,
Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] iio: light: stk3310: use dev_err_probe where
possible
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:40:16AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 03:50:41PM -0400, Aren Moynihan wrote:
> > Using dev_err_probe instead of dev_err and return makes the errors
> > easier to understand by including the error name, and saves a little
> > code.
>
> ...
>
> > #define STK3310_REGFIELD(name) \
> > do { \
> > data->reg_##name = \
> > - devm_regmap_field_alloc(&client->dev, regmap, \
> > + devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, regmap, \
> > stk3310_reg_field_##name); \
> > - if (IS_ERR(data->reg_##name)) { \
> > - dev_err(&client->dev, "reg field alloc failed.\n"); \
> > - return PTR_ERR(data->reg_##name); \
> > - } \
> > + if (IS_ERR(data->reg_##name)) \
>
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, \
> > + PTR_ERR(data->reg_##name), \
>
> AFAICS these two can be put on one.
This doesn't leave room for whitespace between the end of line and "\",
replacing "do { } while (0)" with "({ })" and deindenting could make
enough room to clean this up the formatting of this macro though.
> > + "reg field alloc failed.\n"); \
> > } while (0)
>
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -654,12 +652,11 @@ static int stk3310_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > int ret;
> > struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > struct stk3310_data *data;
> > + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>
> This should has been done a few patches earlier...
Moving it there now
- Aren
Powered by blists - more mailing lists