| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202411122121.de84272a-oliver.sang@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 22:00:19 +0800
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, Christian Brauner
<brauner@...nel.org>, Jing Xia <jing.xia@...soc.com>, Brian Geffon
<bgeffon@...gle.com>, Benoit Lize <lizeb@...gle.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<ying.huang@...el.com>, <feng.tang@...el.com>, <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
<oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: [linux-next:master] [epoll] 900bbaae67: filebench.sum_operations/s
3.8% regression
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a 3.8% regression of filebench.sum_operations/s on:
commit: 900bbaae67e980945dec74d36f8afe0de7556d5a ("epoll: Add synchronous wakeup support for ep_poll_callback")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
[test failed on linux-next/master 5b913f5d7d7fe0f567dea8605f21da6eaa1735fb]
testcase: filebench
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3
compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 128 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8358 CPU @ 2.60GHz (Ice Lake) with 128G memory
parameters:
disk: 1HDD
fs: ext4
fs2: cifs
test: webproxy.f
cpufreq_governor: performance
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202411122121.de84272a-oliver.sang@intel.com
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241112/202411122121.de84272a-oliver.sang@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs2/fs/kconfig/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-12/performance/1HDD/cifs/ext4/x86_64-rhel-8.3/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-icl-2sp6/webproxy.f/filebench
commit:
0dfcb72d33 ("coredump: add cond_resched() to dump_user_range")
900bbaae67 ("epoll: Add synchronous wakeup support for ep_poll_callback")
0dfcb72d33c767bb 900bbaae67e980945dec74d36f8
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
0.03 +0.0 0.04 mpstat.cpu.all.irq%
0.85 -0.1 0.76 mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
2185818 ± 58% -45.3% 1195059 ±104% numa-meminfo.node1.FilePages
1975339 ± 64% -52.1% 946422 ±133% numa-meminfo.node1.Unevictable
364.50 ± 12% +50.6% 549.00 ± 2% perf-c2c.DRAM.remote
208.17 ± 12% +56.4% 325.67 ± 6% perf-c2c.HITM.remote
1002 ± 59% +152.4% 2530 ± 32% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min
8764 ± 3% -25.7% 6515 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev
13791 -5.3% 13057 vmstat.system.cs
11314 +4.2% 11784 vmstat.system.in
546482 ± 58% -45.3% 298775 ±104% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_file_pages
493834 ± 64% -52.1% 236605 ±133% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_unevictable
493834 ± 64% -52.1% 236605 ±133% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_unevictable
13.58 -3.2% 13.15 filebench.sum_bytes_mb/s
232514 -3.8% 223695 filebench.sum_operations
3874 -3.8% 3727 filebench.sum_operations/s
1019 -3.8% 980.50 filebench.sum_reads/s
25.75 +3.9% 26.76 filebench.sum_time_ms/op
203.83 -3.7% 196.33 filebench.sum_writes/s
499886 -1.8% 490769 filebench.time.file_system_outputs
17741 ± 2% -3.9% 17040 filebench.time.minor_page_faults
68.50 -14.6% 58.50 filebench.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
123.86 -14.9% 105.36 filebench.time.system_time
350879 -2.8% 341014 filebench.time.voluntary_context_switches
29557 -4.4% 28256 proc-vmstat.nr_active_anon
16635 ± 3% +4.3% 17352 proc-vmstat.nr_active_file
37364 -3.8% 35926 proc-vmstat.nr_shmem
29557 -4.4% 28256 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_anon
16635 ± 3% +4.3% 17352 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_file
12281 ± 13% +47.2% 18083 ± 15% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults
965.00 ± 6% -30.8% 668.00 ± 20% proc-vmstat.numa_huge_pte_updates
518951 ± 6% -28.2% 372754 ± 20% proc-vmstat.numa_pte_updates
73011 -1.1% 72183 proc-vmstat.pgactivate
698445 +2.2% 713680 proc-vmstat.pgfault
31722 +14.9% 36439 ± 3% proc-vmstat.pgreuse
1.12 ± 20% -0.3 0.81 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__lookup_slow
0.37 ± 26% -0.2 0.20 ± 29% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vma_alloc_folio_noprof
0.39 ± 9% -0.2 0.22 ± 56% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__hrtimer_next_event_base
0.18 ± 40% -0.1 0.06 ± 73% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__poll
0.18 ± 40% -0.1 0.06 ± 73% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_poll
0.18 ± 40% -0.1 0.06 ± 73% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_sys_poll
0.16 ± 45% -0.1 0.05 ± 84% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.perf_evlist__poll_thread
0.15 ± 33% +0.1 0.25 ± 15% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.smp_call_function_many_cond
0.03 ±100% +0.1 0.14 ± 49% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.lockref_get_not_dead
0.13 ± 47% +0.1 0.28 ± 39% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.irq_work_tick
0.49 ± 32% +0.3 0.77 ± 20% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__wait_for_common
0.82 ± 20% +0.4 1.22 ± 21% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.affine_move_task
0.11 ± 37% -0.1 0.04 ±112% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.task_contending
0.03 ±100% +0.1 0.14 ± 49% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.lockref_get_not_dead
9.279e+08 -5.0% 8.816e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
2.93 +0.0 2.98 perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
13227049 +4.3% 13791182 perf-stat.i.branch-misses
2.99 +0.2 3.20 ± 2% perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate%
1805840 ± 2% +19.2% 2152127 perf-stat.i.cache-misses
47931959 +6.2% 50910857 perf-stat.i.cache-references
13706 -4.3% 13122 perf-stat.i.context-switches
4.597e+09 -8.8% 4.192e+09 perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
338.72 +70.9% 578.79 perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations
2345 ± 2% -13.2% 2036 ± 3% perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
4.233e+09 -4.7% 4.035e+09 perf-stat.i.instructions
0.77 +1.8% 0.78 perf-stat.i.ipc
2957 ± 2% +4.2% 3081 perf-stat.i.minor-faults
2957 ± 2% +4.2% 3081 perf-stat.i.page-faults
0.43 ± 2% +25.0% 0.53 perf-stat.overall.MPKI
1.42 +0.1 1.56 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
3.77 ± 2% +0.5 4.23 perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate%
1.09 -4.3% 1.04 perf-stat.overall.cpi
2547 ± 2% -23.5% 1948 perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
0.92 +4.5% 0.96 perf-stat.overall.ipc
9.229e+08 -5.0% 8.77e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
13149814 +4.3% 13712774 perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
1795922 ± 2% +19.2% 2140605 perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
47675878 +6.2% 50645024 perf-stat.ps.cache-references
13636 -4.3% 13055 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
4.573e+09 -8.8% 4.171e+09 perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
336.94 +70.9% 575.93 perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations
4.21e+09 -4.7% 4.014e+09 perf-stat.ps.instructions
2934 ± 2% +4.2% 3057 perf-stat.ps.minor-faults
2934 ± 2% +4.2% 3057 perf-stat.ps.page-faults
7.63e+11 -4.2% 7.309e+11 perf-stat.total.instructions
0.00 ±223% +6816.7% 0.07 ± 34% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.stop_one_cpu.migrate_task_to.task_numa_migrate.isra
0.03 ± 20% +40.2% 0.04 ± 16% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.do_poll.constprop.0.do_sys_poll
0.03 ± 3% +53.0% 0.05 ± 3% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.ep_poll.do_epoll_wait.__x64_sys_epoll_wait
0.08 ± 5% -11.9% 0.07 ± 3% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.kthread.ret_from_fork.ret_from_fork_asm
0.05 ± 3% +14.2% 0.05 ± 4% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.rwsem_down_write_slowpath.down_write.open_last_lookups
0.03 +26.5% 0.03 ± 2% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.wait_woken.sk_wait_data.tcp_recvmsg_locked
0.02 ±223% +552.7% 0.10 ± 47% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.cancel_work_sync._cifsFileInfo_put.cifs_close_deferred_file_under_dentry.cifs_unlink
0.00 ±223% +15516.7% 0.16 ± 30% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.stop_one_cpu.migrate_task_to.task_numa_migrate.isra
0.16 ± 6% +16.5% 0.19 ± 5% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.cifs_demultiplex_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork.ret_from_fork_asm
33.98 ± 11% +28.0% 43.51 ± 5% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.process_one_work.worker_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork
0.56 +13.7% 0.63 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.io_schedule.folio_wait_bit_common.folio_wait_writeback.__filemap_fdatawait_range
392.79 ± 12% +29.2% 507.64 ± 7% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.do_poll.constprop.0.do_sys_poll
1.02 +32.4% 1.35 ± 2% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.ep_poll.do_epoll_wait.__x64_sys_epoll_wait
0.24 +10.7% 0.27 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.wait_woken.sk_wait_data.tcp_recvmsg_locked
99.17 ± 9% -22.0% 77.33 ± 8% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_noprof.cifs_strndup_to_utf16.cifs_convert_path_to_utf16.smb2_compound_op
82.50 ± 21% -48.7% 42.33 ± 16% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__cond_resched.cancel_work_sync._cifsFileInfo_put.process_one_work.worker_thread
741.67 ± 4% +8.5% 804.67 ± 5% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__cond_resched.cifs_demultiplex_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork.ret_from_fork_asm
1228 -13.1% 1067 ± 5% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__cond_resched.process_one_work.worker_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork
2421 ± 3% -13.8% 2088 ± 3% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__lock_sock.lock_sock_nested.tcp_recvmsg.inet6_recvmsg
41.50 ± 7% -25.3% 31.00 ± 8% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.do_poll.constprop.0.do_sys_poll
10750 -24.7% 8094 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.ep_poll.do_epoll_wait.__x64_sys_epoll_wait
279.23 ± 2% +9.1% 304.73 ± 3% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_noprof.cifs_strndup_to_utf16.cifs_convert_path_to_utf16.smb2_compound_op
1001 +111.3% 2115 ± 37% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.do_poll.constprop.0.do_sys_poll
286.84 ± 4% +10.7% 317.62 ± 8% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.rwsem_down_write_slowpath.down_write.do_unlinkat
290.82 ± 3% +11.8% 325.18 ± 8% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.wait_for_response.compound_send_recv.cifs_send_recv.SMB2_open
291.61 ± 2% +11.4% 324.95 ± 9% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.wait_for_response.compound_send_recv.smb2_compound_op.smb2_query_path_info
0.13 ± 6% +19.6% 0.15 ± 7% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.cifs_demultiplex_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork.ret_from_fork_asm
33.97 ± 11% +27.9% 43.46 ± 5% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.process_one_work.worker_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork
0.01 ±223% +12287.9% 0.68 ±114% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.stop_one_cpu.migrate_task_to.task_numa_migrate.isra
0.08 ± 4% +9.3% 0.09 ± 4% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__lock_sock.sk_wait_data.tcp_recvmsg_locked.tcp_recvmsg
0.47 +15.3% 0.54 perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.io_schedule.folio_wait_bit_common.folio_wait_writeback.__filemap_fdatawait_range
392.76 ± 12% +29.2% 507.60 ± 7% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.do_poll.constprop.0.do_sys_poll
0.99 +31.7% 1.30 ± 2% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.ep_poll.do_epoll_wait.__x64_sys_epoll_wait
1.05 ± 3% +14.2% 1.20 ± 6% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.__mutex_lock.constprop.0.cifs_call_async
279.13 ± 2% +9.1% 304.65 ± 3% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_noprof.cifs_strndup_to_utf16.cifs_convert_path_to_utf16.smb2_compound_op
0.01 ±223% +35681.8% 1.97 ±121% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.stop_one_cpu.migrate_task_to.task_numa_migrate.isra
1001 +111.3% 2115 ± 37% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.do_poll.constprop.0.do_sys_poll
286.74 ± 4% +10.7% 317.50 ± 8% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_preempt_disabled.rwsem_down_write_slowpath.down_write.do_unlinkat
290.73 ± 3% +11.8% 325.08 ± 8% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.wait_for_response.compound_send_recv.cifs_send_recv.SMB2_open
291.52 ± 2% +11.4% 324.84 ± 9% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.wait_for_response.compound_send_recv.smb2_compound_op.smb2_query_path_info
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists