[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241112153842.GC3017802@yaz-khff2.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:38:42 -0500
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
Cc: bp@...en8.de, tony.luck@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
sohil.mehta@...el.com, nik.borisov@...e.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] x86/mce: Fix typos
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 02:04:28PM +0800, Qiuxu Zhuo wrote:
> Fix typos in comments.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - No changes.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Collect "Reviewed-by:" from Nikolay & Sohil.
> - Remove the detail typos from the commit message (Sohil).
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Collect "Reviewed-by:" from Tony.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> index 0f0c6e9d9183..6e194ccffc7c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static noinstr int mce_start(int *no_way_out)
> } else {
> /*
> * Subject: Now start the scanning loop one by one in
> - * the original callin order.
> + * the original calling order.
I don't think this is a typo. It seems to refer to the mce_callin
variable/idea.
For example, each CPU "calls in" when ready. This is independent of when
each CPU is "called" to do something.
CPUs are called in this order 0, 1, 2.
CPUs "call in" in this order 1, 0, 2.
When a CPU is called can be different from when it responds.
Maybe I'm reading too much into this. :/
> * This way when there are any shared banks it will be
> * only seen by one CPU before cleared, avoiding duplicates.
> */
> @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ static void apply_quirks_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> /* This should be disabled by the BIOS, but isn't always */
> if (c->x86 == 15 && this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks) > 4) {
> /*
> - * disable GART TBL walk error reporting, which
> + * disable GART TLB walk error reporting, which
This also is not a typo. TBL -> table
>From old AMD K8 BKDG document:
10 GartTblWkEn GART Table Walk Error Reporting Enable R/W 0
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists