[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173142698242.893467.5937732812824342152.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 16:07:30 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kselftest/arm64: Avoid detecting spurious PAC key collisions
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:18:54 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> The PAC tests currently generate a very small number of false failures
> since the limited size of PAC keys, especially with fewer bits allocated
> for PAC due to larger VA, means collisions in generated PACs are
> possible even if the PAC keys are different. The test tries to work around
> this by testing repeatedly but doesn't iterate often enough to be
> reliable.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!
[1/2] kselftest/arm64: Don't leak pipe fds in pac.exec_sign_all()
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/27141b690547
[2/2] kselftest/arm64: Try harder to generate different keys during PAC tests
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/91a6533811bb
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists