[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a4ef71f-905e-4f2a-b3d2-8fd939c5a865@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:06:45 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, clm@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] mm/filemap: add read support for RWF_UNCACHED
On 11/12/24 9:39 AM, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 08:14:28AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 11/11/24 10:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 04:42:25PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> Here's the slightly cleaned up version, this is the one I ran testing
>>>> with.
>>>
>>> Looks reasonable to me, but you probably get better reviews on the
>>> fstests lists.
>>
>> I'll send it out once this patchset is a bit closer to integration,
>> there's the usual chicken and egg situation with it. For now, it's quite
>> handy for my testing, found a few issues with this version. So thanks
>> for the suggestion, sure beats writing more of your own test cases :-)
>>
>
> fsx support is probably a good idea as well. It's similar in idea to
> fsstress, but bashes the same file with mixed operations and includes
> data integrity validation checks as well. It's pretty useful for
> uncovering subtle corner case issues or bad interactions..
Indeed, I did that too. Re-running xfstests right now with that too.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists