[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43be0a16-0a06-d7fb-3925-4337fb38e9e9@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:53:19 -0600
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>,
John Allen <john.allen@....com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Michael Roth
<michael.roth@....com>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] KVM: SVM: Use new ccp GCTX API
On 11/7/24 17:24, Dionna Glaze wrote:
> Guest context pages should be near 1-to-1 with allocated ASIDs. With the
> GCTX API, the ccp driver is better able to associate guest context pages
> with the ASID that is/will be bound to it.
>
> This is important to the firmware hotloading implementation to not
> corrupt any running VM's guest context page before userspace commits a
> new firmware.
>
> CC: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> CC: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>
> CC: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> CC: John Allen <john.allen@....com>
> CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> CC: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
> CC: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> CC: Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>
> CC: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>
> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
> CC: Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
> CC: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 74 ++++++++++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index cea41b8cdabe4..d7cef84750b33 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned int nr_asids;
> static unsigned long *sev_asid_bitmap;
> static unsigned long *sev_reclaim_asid_bitmap;
>
> -static int snp_decommission_context(struct kvm *kvm);
> +static int kvm_decommission_snp_context(struct kvm *kvm);
Why the name change? It seems like it just makes the patch a bit harder
to follow since there are two things going on.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> struct enc_region {
> struct list_head list;
> @@ -2168,51 +2168,12 @@ int sev_dev_get_attr(u32 group, u64 attr, u64 *val)
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * The guest context contains all the information, keys and metadata
> - * associated with the guest that the firmware tracks to implement SEV
> - * and SNP features. The firmware stores the guest context in hypervisor
> - * provide page via the SNP_GCTX_CREATE command.
> - */
> -static void *snp_context_create(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> -{
> - struct sev_data_snp_addr data = {};
> - void *context;
> - int rc;
> -
> - /* Allocate memory for context page */
> - context = snp_alloc_firmware_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> - if (!context)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
> - data.address = __psp_pa(context);
> - rc = __sev_issue_cmd(argp->sev_fd, SEV_CMD_SNP_GCTX_CREATE, &data, &argp->error);
> - if (rc) {
> - pr_warn("Failed to create SEV-SNP context, rc %d fw_error %d",
> - rc, argp->error);
> - snp_free_firmware_page(context);
> - return ERR_PTR(rc);
> - }
> -
> - return context;
> -}
> -
> -static int snp_bind_asid(struct kvm *kvm, int *error)
> -{
> - struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
> - struct sev_data_snp_activate data = {0};
> -
> - data.gctx_paddr = __psp_pa(sev->snp_context);
> - data.asid = sev_get_asid(kvm);
> - return sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_SNP_ACTIVATE, &data, error);
> -}
> -
> static int snp_launch_start(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> {
> struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
> struct sev_data_snp_launch_start start = {0};
> struct kvm_sev_snp_launch_start params;
> - int rc;
> + int rc, asid;
>
> if (!sev_snp_guest(kvm))
> return -ENOTTY;
> @@ -2238,14 +2199,19 @@ static int snp_launch_start(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> if (params.policy & SNP_POLICY_MASK_SINGLE_SOCKET)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - sev->snp_context = snp_context_create(kvm, argp);
> + rc = sev_check_external_user(argp->sev_fd);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + asid = sev_get_asid(kvm);
> + sev->snp_context = sev_snp_create_context(asid, &argp->error);
> if (IS_ERR(sev->snp_context))
> return PTR_ERR(sev->snp_context);
>
> start.gctx_paddr = __psp_pa(sev->snp_context);
> start.policy = params.policy;
> memcpy(start.gosvw, params.gosvw, sizeof(params.gosvw));
> - rc = __sev_issue_cmd(argp->sev_fd, SEV_CMD_SNP_LAUNCH_START, &start, &argp->error);
> + rc = sev_do_cmd(SEV_CMD_SNP_LAUNCH_START, &start, &argp->error);
> if (rc) {
> pr_debug("%s: SEV_CMD_SNP_LAUNCH_START firmware command failed, rc %d\n",
> __func__, rc);
> @@ -2253,7 +2219,7 @@ static int snp_launch_start(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> }
>
> sev->fd = argp->sev_fd;
> - rc = snp_bind_asid(kvm, &argp->error);
> + rc = sev_snp_activate_asid(asid, &argp->error);
> if (rc) {
> pr_debug("%s: Failed to bind ASID to SEV-SNP context, rc %d\n",
> __func__, rc);
> @@ -2263,7 +2229,7 @@ static int snp_launch_start(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> return 0;
>
> e_free_context:
> - snp_decommission_context(kvm);
> + kvm_decommission_snp_context(kvm);
>
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -2874,26 +2840,26 @@ int sev_vm_copy_enc_context_from(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int source_fd)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int snp_decommission_context(struct kvm *kvm)
> +static int kvm_decommission_snp_context(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
> - struct sev_data_snp_addr data = {};
> - int ret;
> + int ret, error;
>
> /* If context is not created then do nothing */
> if (!sev->snp_context)
> return 0;
>
> - /* Do the decommision, which will unbind the ASID from the SNP context */
> - data.address = __sme_pa(sev->snp_context);
> + /*
> + * Do the decommision, which will unbind the ASID from the SNP context
> + * and free the context page.
> + */
> down_write(&sev_deactivate_lock);
> - ret = sev_do_cmd(SEV_CMD_SNP_DECOMMISSION, &data, NULL);
> + ret = sev_snp_guest_decommission(sev->asid, &error);
> up_write(&sev_deactivate_lock);
>
> - if (WARN_ONCE(ret, "Failed to release guest context, ret %d", ret))
> + if (WARN_ONCE(ret, "Failed to release guest context, ret %d fw err %d", ret, error))
> return ret;
>
> - snp_free_firmware_page(sev->snp_context);
> sev->snp_context = NULL;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -2947,7 +2913,7 @@ void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
> * Decomission handles unbinding of the ASID. If it fails for
> * some unexpected reason, just leak the ASID.
> */
> - if (snp_decommission_context(kvm))
> + if (kvm_decommission_snp_context(kvm))
> return;
> } else {
> sev_unbind_asid(kvm, sev->handle);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists