[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241112185217.48792-1-nsaenz@amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:52:16 +0000
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...zon.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Matt Fleming
<matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stanspas@...zon.de>,
<nh-open-source@...zon.com>, Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...zon.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/efi: Drop support for the EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE
Drop support for the EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE. It was a failed, short-lived
experiment that broke the boot both on Linux and Windows, and was
replaced by the EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE shortly after.
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...zon.com>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 19 ---------------
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 42 ----------------------------------
include/linux/efi.h | 17 +++-----------
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index 88a96816de9a..375ebd78296a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -54,14 +54,12 @@
#include <asm/uv/uv.h>
static unsigned long efi_systab_phys __initdata;
-static unsigned long prop_phys = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR;
static unsigned long uga_phys = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR;
static unsigned long efi_runtime, efi_nr_tables;
unsigned long efi_fw_vendor, efi_config_table;
static const efi_config_table_type_t arch_tables[] __initconst = {
- {EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE_GUID, &prop_phys, "PROP" },
{UGA_IO_PROTOCOL_GUID, &uga_phys, "UGA" },
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_UV
{UV_SYSTEM_TABLE_GUID, &uv_systab_phys, "UVsystab" },
@@ -82,7 +80,6 @@ static const unsigned long * const efi_tables[] = {
&efi_runtime,
&efi_config_table,
&efi.esrt,
- &prop_phys,
&efi_mem_attr_table,
#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_RCI2_TABLE
&rci2_table_phys,
@@ -502,22 +499,6 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
return;
}
- /* Parse the EFI Properties table if it exists */
- if (prop_phys != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) {
- efi_properties_table_t *tbl;
-
- tbl = early_memremap_ro(prop_phys, sizeof(*tbl));
- if (tbl == NULL) {
- pr_err("Could not map Properties table!\n");
- } else {
- if (tbl->memory_protection_attribute &
- EFI_PROPERTIES_RUNTIME_MEMORY_PROTECTION_NON_EXECUTABLE_PE_DATA)
- set_bit(EFI_NX_PE_DATA, &efi.flags);
-
- early_memunmap(tbl, sizeof(*tbl));
- }
- }
-
set_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &efi.flags);
efi_clean_memmap();
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
index 91d31ac422d6..ac57259a432b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
@@ -412,51 +412,9 @@ static int __init efi_update_mem_attr(struct mm_struct *mm, efi_memory_desc_t *m
void __init efi_runtime_update_mappings(void)
{
- efi_memory_desc_t *md;
-
- /*
- * Use the EFI Memory Attribute Table for mapping permissions if it
- * exists, since it is intended to supersede EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE.
- */
if (efi_enabled(EFI_MEM_ATTR)) {
efi_disable_ibt_for_runtime = false;
efi_memattr_apply_permissions(NULL, efi_update_mem_attr);
- return;
- }
-
- /*
- * EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE is intended to replace
- * EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE. So, use EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE to update
- * permissions only if EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE is not
- * published by the firmware. Even if we find a buggy implementation of
- * EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE, don't fall back to
- * EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE, because of the same reason.
- */
-
- if (!efi_enabled(EFI_NX_PE_DATA))
- return;
-
- for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) {
- unsigned long pf = 0;
-
- if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME))
- continue;
-
- if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB))
- pf |= _PAGE_PCD;
-
- if ((md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_XP) ||
- (md->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA))
- pf |= _PAGE_NX;
-
- if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RO) &&
- (md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE))
- pf |= _PAGE_RW;
-
- if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
- pf |= _PAGE_ENC;
-
- efi_update_mappings(md, pf);
}
}
diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index e28d88066033..e5815867aba9 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -379,7 +379,6 @@ void efi_native_runtime_setup(void);
#define EFI_SYSTEM_RESOURCE_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0xb122a263, 0x3661, 0x4f68, 0x99, 0x29, 0x78, 0xf8, 0xb0, 0xd6, 0x21, 0x80)
#define EFI_FILE_SYSTEM_GUID EFI_GUID(0x964e5b22, 0x6459, 0x11d2, 0x8e, 0x39, 0x00, 0xa0, 0xc9, 0x69, 0x72, 0x3b)
#define DEVICE_TREE_GUID EFI_GUID(0xb1b621d5, 0xf19c, 0x41a5, 0x83, 0x0b, 0xd9, 0x15, 0x2c, 0x69, 0xaa, 0xe0)
-#define EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x880aaca3, 0x4adc, 0x4a04, 0x90, 0x79, 0xb7, 0x47, 0x34, 0x08, 0x25, 0xe5)
#define EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL_GUID EFI_GUID(0x3152bca5, 0xeade, 0x433d, 0x86, 0x2e, 0xc0, 0x1c, 0xdc, 0x29, 0x1f, 0x44)
#define EFI_RNG_ALGORITHM_RAW EFI_GUID(0xe43176d7, 0xb6e8, 0x4827, 0xb7, 0x84, 0x7f, 0xfd, 0xc4, 0xb6, 0x85, 0x61)
#define EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0xdcfa911d, 0x26eb, 0x469f, 0xa2, 0x20, 0x38, 0xb7, 0xdc, 0x46, 0x12, 0x20)
@@ -580,15 +579,6 @@ struct efi_mem_range {
u64 attribute;
};
-typedef struct {
- u32 version;
- u32 length;
- u64 memory_protection_attribute;
-} efi_properties_table_t;
-
-#define EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE_VERSION 0x00010000
-#define EFI_PROPERTIES_RUNTIME_MEMORY_PROTECTION_NON_EXECUTABLE_PE_DATA 0x1
-
typedef struct {
u16 version;
u16 length;
@@ -871,10 +861,9 @@ static inline int efi_range_is_wc(unsigned long start, unsigned long len)
#define EFI_PARAVIRT 6 /* Access is via a paravirt interface */
#define EFI_ARCH_1 7 /* First arch-specific bit */
#define EFI_DBG 8 /* Print additional debug info at runtime */
-#define EFI_NX_PE_DATA 9 /* Can runtime data regions be mapped non-executable? */
-#define EFI_MEM_ATTR 10 /* Did firmware publish an EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES table? */
-#define EFI_MEM_NO_SOFT_RESERVE 11 /* Is the kernel configured to ignore soft reservations? */
-#define EFI_PRESERVE_BS_REGIONS 12 /* Are EFI boot-services memory segments available? */
+#define EFI_MEM_ATTR 9 /* Did firmware publish an EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES table? */
+#define EFI_MEM_NO_SOFT_RESERVE 10 /* Is the kernel configured to ignore soft reservations? */
+#define EFI_PRESERVE_BS_REGIONS 11 /* Are EFI boot-services memory segments available? */
#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
/*
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists