[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AS8PR04MB8849F0D0933B558FCB1A652896592@AS8PR04MB8849.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:17:37 +0000
From: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Frank Li
<frank.li@....com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/5] net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD
number for i.MX95 ENETC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 11:15 AM
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/5] net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD
> number for i.MX95 ENETC
>
> The max chained Tx BDs of latest ENETC (i.MX95 ENETC, rev 4.1) has been
> increased to 63, but since the range of MAX_SKB_FRAGS is 17~45, so for
> i.MX95 ENETC and later revision, it is better to set ENETC4_MAX_SKB_FRAGS
> to MAX_SKB_FRAGS.
>
> In addition, add max_frags in struct enetc_drvdata to indicate the max
> chained BDs supported by device. Because the max number of chained BDs
> supported by LS1028A and i.MX95 ENETC is different.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> ---
> v2:
> 1. Refine the commit message
> 2. Add Reviewed-by tag
> v3: no changes
> ---
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists