linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] irqchip: THEAD_C901_ACLINT_SSWI should depend on ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX-MV1W2MBV0WQuXkEU-qvfbsb_pcAFrHCGWUFT7TYd6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:44:07 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
Cc: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: THEAD_C901_ACLINT_SSWI should depend on ARCH_THEAD

Hi Samuel,

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 5:38 PM Samuel Holland
<samuel.holland@...ive.com> wrote:
> On 2024-11-12 9:31 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The T-HEAD ACLINT S-mode IPI Interrupt Controller is only present on
> > T-HEAD SoCs.  Hence add a dependency on ARCH_THEAD, to prevent asking
>
> This is not correct. This interrupt controller is part of the T-HEAD CPU IP, so
> it is included in SoCs from other vendors (Allwinner, Sophgo, etc.) that use
> T-HEAD CPUs as well.

In that case I am withdrawing this patch.
Thanks for the explanation!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds